Hi, Bruce, > -----Original Message----- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:23 PM > To: Ananyev, Konstantin > Cc: Chen, Jing D; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:14:26PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chen Jing > > > D(Mark) > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:04 PM > > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function > > > > > > From: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > > > > > > Add func fm10k_recv_raw_pkts_vec to parse raw packets, in which > > > includes possible chained packets. > > > Add func fm10k_recv_pkts_vec to receive single mbuf packet. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jing D(Mark) <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h | 1 + > > > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 213 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > > > index d924cae..285254f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > > > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > > > @@ -327,4 +327,5 @@ uint16_t fm10k_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct > rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, > > > uint16_t nb_pkts); > > > > > > int fm10k_rxq_vec_setup(struct fm10k_rx_queue *rxq); > > > +uint16_t fm10k_recv_pkts_vec(void *, struct rte_mbuf **, uint16_t); > > > #endif > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c > > > b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c > > > index 581a309..63b34b5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c > > > @@ -281,3 +281,216 @@ fm10k_rxq_rearm(struct fm10k_rx_queue *rxq) > > > /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */ > > > FM10K_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->tail_ptr, rx_id); } > > > + > > > +/* > > > + * vPMD receive routine, now only accept (nb_pkts == > > > +RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST) > > > + * in one loop > > > + * > > > + * Notice: > > > + * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, just return no packet > > Why this limitation? I believe this limitation has already been removed for > ixgbe, so the same solution should be applicable here > > /Bruce
Thanks! I'll change it accordingly.
