Recheck-request: iol-intel-Performance

Triggering a retest due to testbed instability yesterday.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 9:53 PM Huichao Cai <chcch...@163.com> wrote:

> In the function __rte_graph_mcore_dispatch_sched_node_enqueue,
> use a slower loop to search for the graph, modify the search logic
> to record the result of the first search, and use this record for
> subsequent searches to improve search speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcch...@163.com>
> ---
>  devtools/libabigail.abignore               |  5 +++++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_25_03.rst     |  1 +
>  lib/graph/rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c | 11 +++++++----
>  lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h        |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> index 21b8cd6113..8876aaee2e 100644
> --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> @@ -33,3 +33,8 @@
>  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>  ; Temporary exceptions till next major ABI version ;
>  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> +[suppress_type]
> +        name = rte_node
> +        has_size_change = no
> +        has_data_member_inserted_between =
> +{offset_after(original_process), offset_of(xstat_off)}
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_25_03.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_25_03.rst
> index 269ab6f68a..16a888fd19 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_25_03.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_25_03.rst
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ ABI Changes
>
>  * No ABI change that would break compatibility with 24.11.
>
> +* graph: Added ``graph`` field to the ``dispatch`` structure in the
> ``rte_node`` structure.
>
>  Known Issues
>  ------------
> diff --git a/lib/graph/rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c
> b/lib/graph/rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c
> index a590fc9497..a81d338227 100644
> --- a/lib/graph/rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c
> +++ b/lib/graph/rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c
> @@ -118,11 +118,14 @@ __rte_graph_mcore_dispatch_sched_node_enqueue(struct
> rte_node *node,
>                                               struct rte_graph_rq_head *rq)
>  {
>         const unsigned int lcore_id = node->dispatch.lcore_id;
> -       struct rte_graph *graph;
> +       struct rte_graph *graph = node->dispatch.graph;
>
> -       SLIST_FOREACH(graph, rq, next)
> -               if (graph->dispatch.lcore_id == lcore_id)
> -                       break;
> +       if (unlikely((!graph) || (graph->dispatch.lcore_id != lcore_id))) {
> +               SLIST_FOREACH(graph, rq, next)
> +                       if (graph->dispatch.lcore_id == lcore_id)
> +                               break;
> +               node->dispatch.graph = graph;
> +       }
>
>         return graph != NULL ? __graph_sched_node_enqueue(node, graph) :
> false;
>  }
> diff --git a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> index d3ec88519d..aef0f65673 100644
> --- a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> +++ b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct __rte_cache_aligned rte_node {
>                         unsigned int lcore_id;  /**< Node running lcore. */
>                         uint64_t total_sched_objs; /**< Number of objects
> scheduled. */
>                         uint64_t total_sched_fail; /**< Number of
> scheduled failure. */
> +                       struct rte_graph *graph;  /**< Graph corresponding
> to lcore_id. */
>                 } dispatch;
>         };
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>

Reply via email to