On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:48:08PM +0000, shesha Sreenivasamurthy (shesha) wrote: > If huge pages are allocated for the guest and if the guest crashes there may > be > a chance that the new guest may not be able to get huge pages again as some > other guest or process on the host used it. But I am not able to understand > memory corruption you are talking about. In my opinion, if a process using a > piece of memory goes away, it should not re-attach to the same piece of memory > without running a sanity check on it.
guest memory is allocated an freed by hypervisor, right? I don't think it's dpdk's job. -- MST
