From: Barbara Skobiej <barbara.skob...@intel.com>

One of the bit shifts in MAC hash calculation triggers a static analysis
warning about a potential overflow. Fix the data type to avoid this.

Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Barbara Skobiej <barbara.skob...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c | 6 ++++--
 drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_vf.c  | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c 
b/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c
index 4ec7cab7ab..2fa97d12a9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c
@@ -541,8 +541,10 @@ u32 e1000_hash_mc_addr_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u8 
*mc_addr)
                break;
        }
 
-       hash_value = hash_mask & (((mc_addr[4] >> (8 - bit_shift)) |
-                                 (((u16) mc_addr[5]) << bit_shift)));
+       hash_value = (u32)mc_addr[4];
+       hash_value = hash_value >> (8 - bit_shift);
+       hash_value |= (((u32)mc_addr[5]) << bit_shift);
+       hash_value &= hash_mask;
 
        return hash_value;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_vf.c 
b/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_vf.c
index e0c95aa130..b02459900b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_vf.c
@@ -345,8 +345,10 @@ STATIC u32 e1000_hash_mc_addr_vf(struct e1000_hw *hw, u8 
*mc_addr)
        while (hash_mask >> bit_shift != 0xFF && bit_shift < 4)
                bit_shift++;
 
-       hash_value = hash_mask & (((mc_addr[4] >> (8 - bit_shift)) |
-                                 (((u16) mc_addr[5]) << bit_shift)));
+       hash_value = (u32)mc_addr[4];
+       hash_value = hash_value >> (8 - bit_shift);
+       hash_value |= (((u32)mc_addr[5]) << bit_shift);
+       hash_value &= hash_mask;
 
        return hash_value;
 }
-- 
2.43.5

Reply via email to