From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com> 1) ./lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2362:9 : warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’ 2) ../lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2478:9 : warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’
Both rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data() and rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() expect @num_keys <= RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX. So, for both cases it should be safe to replace VLA with fixed size array. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com> Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com> --- lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index 9575e8aa0c..fc93182efe 100644 --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, (num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) || (hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL); - int32_t positions[num_keys]; + int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX]; __rte_hash_lookup_bulk(h, keys, num_keys, positions, hit_mask, data); @@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash *h, (num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) || (hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL); - int32_t positions[num_keys]; + int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX]; __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk(h, keys, sig, num_keys, positions, hit_mask, data); -- 2.47.2.vfs.0.1