From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>

1) ./lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2362:9
    : warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’
2) ../lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:2478:9
    : warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘positions’

Both rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data() and
rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() expect
@num_keys <= RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX.
So, for both cases it should be safe to replace VLA with fixed size
array.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
---
 lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index 9575e8aa0c..fc93182efe 100644
--- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash *h, const 
void **keys,
                        (num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) ||
                        (hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL);
 
-       int32_t positions[num_keys];
+       int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
 
        __rte_hash_lookup_bulk(h, keys, num_keys, positions, hit_mask, data);
 
@@ -2534,7 +2534,7 @@ rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(const struct rte_hash 
*h,
                        (num_keys > RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX) ||
                        (hit_mask == NULL)), -EINVAL);
 
-       int32_t positions[num_keys];
+       int32_t positions[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
 
        __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk(h, keys, sig, num_keys,
                        positions, hit_mask, data);
-- 
2.47.2.vfs.0.1

Reply via email to