The test case "test_multi_alloc_statistics" was brittle in that it did
some allocations and frees and then checked statistics without
considering the initial state of the malloc heaps. This meant that,
depending on what allocations/frees were done beforehand, the test can
sometimes fail.

We can improve resiliency by running the test using a new malloc heap,
which means it is unaffected by any previous allocations.

Bugzilla ID: 1579
Fixes: a40a1f8231b4 ("app: various tests update")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
---
v3:
* switched allocation from mmap to malloc allowing it work on windows
* use explicit alignment of the malloc return value to ensure memory
  added to heap is page-aligned.

v2:
* removed unnecessary extra include
* only added new code for non-windows, since using mmap for allocation.
---
 app/test/test_malloc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_malloc.c b/app/test/test_malloc.c
index 02a7d8ef20..9e73c0da09 100644
--- a/app/test/test_malloc.c
+++ b/app/test/test_malloc.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <rte_malloc.h>
 #include <rte_cycles.h>
 #include <rte_random.h>
+#include <rte_eal_paging.h>
 #include <rte_string_fns.h>
 
 #define N 10000
@@ -272,6 +273,34 @@ test_multi_alloc_statistics(void)
        size_t size = 2048;
        int align = 1024;
        int overhead = 0;
+       const size_t pgsz = rte_mem_page_size();
+       const size_t heap_size = (1 << 21);
+
+       if (pgsz < heap_size) {
+               printf("Page size is smaller than heap size\n");
+               return TEST_SKIPPED;
+       }
+
+       if (rte_malloc_heap_create(__func__) != 0) {
+               printf("Failed to create test malloc heap\n");
+               return -1;
+       }
+       /* Allocate some memory using malloc and add it to our test heap. */
+       void *unaligned_memory = malloc(heap_size + pgsz);
+       if (unaligned_memory == NULL) {
+               printf("Failed to allocate memory\n");
+               return -1;
+       }
+       void *memory = RTE_PTR_ALIGN(unaligned_memory, pgsz);
+       if (rte_malloc_heap_memory_add(__func__, memory, heap_size, NULL, 1, 
heap_size) != 0) {
+               printf("Failed to add memory to heap\n");
+               return -1;
+       }
+       socket = rte_malloc_heap_get_socket(__func__);
+       if (socket < 0) {
+               printf("Failed to get socket for test malloc heap.\n");
+               return -1;
+       }
 
        /* Dynamically calculate the overhead by allocating one cacheline and
         * then comparing what was allocated from the heap.
@@ -371,6 +400,12 @@ test_multi_alloc_statistics(void)
                printf("Malloc statistics are incorrect - freed alloc\n");
                return -1;
        }
+
+       /* cleanup */
+       rte_malloc_heap_memory_remove(__func__, memory, heap_size);
+       rte_malloc_heap_destroy(__func__);
+       free(unaligned_memory);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to