On 2025/1/4 3:02, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jan 2025 23:04:13 +0800
> "WanRenyong" <wa...@yunsilicon.com> wrote:
>
>> +static int
>> +xsc_vfio_destroy_qp(void *qp)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + int in_len, out_len, cmd_len;
>> + struct xsc_cmd_destroy_qp_mbox_in *in;
>> + struct xsc_cmd_destroy_qp_mbox_out *out;
>> + struct xsc_vfio_qp *data = (struct xsc_vfio_qp *)qp;
>> +
>> + in_len = sizeof(struct xsc_cmd_destroy_qp_mbox_in);
>> + out_len = sizeof(struct xsc_cmd_destroy_qp_mbox_out);
>> + cmd_len = RTE_MAX(in_len, out_len);
>> +
>> + in = malloc(cmd_len);
>> + if (in == NULL) {
>> + rte_errno = ENOMEM;
>> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to alloc qp destroy cmd memory");
>> + return -rte_errno;
>> + }
>> + memset(in, 0, cmd_len);
> If this data structure needs to be shared between primary and secondary
> process,
> then it needs to be allocated with rte_malloc(). If it does not need to be
> shared, then it can come from heap with malloc().
no, this data structure is not shared between primary and secondary process.
it is a temporary memory to initial mailbox data structure.
--
Thanks,
WanRenyong
