>
> Title for this patch is incorrect. Does it belong merged with the next
> patch in series?
Yes, seems like oringianl title get lost, I think it needs to be:
gro: fix overwrite unprocessed packets
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240523162604.2600-2-konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru/
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 04:44:39PM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>
> >
> > gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl_timeout_flush() is called without taking into account
> > that first entries in pkts[] can be already occupied by
> > un-processed packets.
> >
> > Fixes: 74080d7dcf31 ("gro: support IPv6 for TCP")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
> > ---
> > lib/gro/rte_gro.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> > index d824eebd93..db86117609 100644
> > --- a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> > +++ b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ rte_gro_reassemble_burst(struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > /* Flush all packets from the tables */
> > if (do_vxlan_tcp_gro) {
> > i += gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl_timeout_flush(&vxlan_tcp_tbl,
> > - 0, pkts, nb_pkts);
> > + 0, &pkts[i], nb_pkts - i);
> > }
> >
> > if (do_vxlan_udp_gro) {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
