On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 8:42 PM Vladimir Medvedkin
<vladimir.medved...@intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -445,7 +454,7 @@ test_invalid_rcu(void)
>         rcu_cfg.v = qsv2;
>         rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_FIB_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
>         status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg);
> -       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status != 0, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly 
> attached\n");
> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status = -EEXIST, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly 
> attached\n");

My eyes stopped on this.
Should be == right?


>
>         rte_fib_free(fib);
>         rte_free(qsv);


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to