On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 8:42 PM Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com> wrote: > @@ -445,7 +454,7 @@ test_invalid_rcu(void) > rcu_cfg.v = qsv2; > rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_FIB_QSBR_MODE_SYNC; > status = rte_fib_rcu_qsbr_add(fib, &rcu_cfg); > - RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status != 0, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly > attached\n"); > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT(status = -EEXIST, "Secondary RCU was mistakenly > attached\n");
My eyes stopped on this. Should be == right? > > rte_fib_free(fib); > rte_free(qsv); -- David Marchand