David, Let me take a look.
On 2015/9/16 16:09, David Marchand wrote: > Hello Chao, > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Chao Zhu <chaozhu at linux.vnet.ibm.com > <mailto:chaozhu at linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Actually, without this change, DPDK can't work properly on PPC64 > little endian platform. It'll report "EAL: Not enough memory > available! Requested: xxxMB, available: xxxMB" such kind of error. > But for users, they don't know that changing the value of > CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES can fix this. That why I invoke this patch. > > > Sorry, I forgot to reply in this thread. > > Well, to me, this is a workaround. > Yes it will work, but what happens if tomorrow we have some hardware > that tells us that it has some numa node which 60000 index ? > > I think we need a rework in eal to proerly handle this, like I said in > this mail : > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023630.html > > Do you think you can look into this ? > > > Thanks. > > -- > David Marchand
