On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:39 AM Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:41:07 -0700 > Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > Remove one of the few remaining uses of master/slave. > > > > The IEEE 1588 standard has been updated to remove the use > > of master-slave terminology. Change the sample to Use the terms > > recommended by IEEE 1588g-2022 amendment. > > > > In place of the term “master”, use the term “timeTransmitter”. > > In place of the term “slave”, use the term “timeReceiver”. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com> > > > > --- > > v10 - rebase to current version > > > > doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst | 8 ++-- > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/img/ptpclient.svg | 4 +- > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/intro.rst | 4 +- > > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ptpclient.rst | 29 ++++++------ > > examples/ptpclient/ptpclient.c | 54 +++++++++++----------- > > 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > This patch seems to have been lost/ignored. Could it be merged for 24.11. > > Note: checkpatch complaints here are incorrect. The patch is removing > terms master and slave, but checkpatch can't tell the difference. I thought it would be picked by dpdk-next-net since it looked like a tree-wide change. Since its assigned to me, I will merge it in a day or so and let the set take its course.
Thanks
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
