Hi Maxime, 

It doesn’t need to be backported.

Thanks
Nic

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 1:08 AM
> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> gak...@marvell.com; t...@redhat.com
> Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] baseband/acc: remove check on HARQ memory
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/3/24 22:49, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> > Automatically reset HARQ memory to prevent errors and simplify usage.
> > In a way we can assume that the HARQ output operation will always
> > overwrite the buffer, so we can reset this from the driver to prevent
> > an error being reported when application fails to do this explicitly.
> 
> 
> Should it be backported?
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 3 ++-
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > index 865a050e1b19..27c8bdca3d08 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > @@ -2595,8 +2595,9 @@ vrb_enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(struct
> acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
> >     /* Hard output. */
> >     mbuf_append(h_output_head, h_output, h_out_length);
> >     if (op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.length > 0) {
> > -           /* Push the HARQ output into host memory. */
> > +           /* Push the HARQ output into host memory overwriting
> existing data.
> > +*/
> >             struct rte_mbuf *hq_output_head, *hq_output;
> > +           op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data->data_len = 0;
> >             hq_output_head = op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data;
> >             hq_output = op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data;
> >             hq_len = op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.length;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime

Reply via email to