On 10/4/2024 8:54 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:09:21AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/4/2024 3:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 02:48:21 +0100
>>> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2024 4:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>>> The TAP device does have per-queue stats and handles multi-process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  doc/guides/nics/features/tap.ini | 2 ++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/tap.ini 
>>>>> b/doc/guides/nics/features/tap.ini
>>>>> index f26355e57f..f2ea5cd833 100644
>>>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/tap.ini
>>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/tap.ini
>>>>> @@ -14,10 +14,12 @@ Basic stats          = Y
>>>>>  L3 checksum offload  = Y
>>>>>  L4 checksum offload  = Y
>>>>>  MTU update           = Y
>>>>> +Multiprocess aware   = Y
>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ack
>>>>
>>>>>  Multicast MAC filter = Y
>>>>>  Unicast MAC filter   = Y
>>>>>  Packet type parsing  = Y
>>>>>  Flow control         = Y
>>>>> +Stats per queue      = Y
>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> This feature name is misleading,
>>>> it is for 'rte_eth_dev_set_[rt]x_queue_stats_mapping()' API, which is
>>>> indeed for covering limitation for some drivers.
>>>> Tap does support getting stats per queue, but doesn't support above
>>>> documented feature.
>>>
>>> The stats queue mapping was a feature that was hinted at being removed.
>>> It only exists because of HW limitations on Intel ixgbe NIC and SW
>>> limitations from RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS.
>>>
>>
>>
>> We have a plan to remove 'RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS', by moving queue
>> stats to xstats.
>>
>> But ixgbe limitation is there.
>>
>>> Perhaps there should be a generic SW emulation for this the mapping?
>>>
>>
>> Ack, cc'ed Bruce.
>> But I am not sure ROI of the effort at this stage.
> 
> Not sure what the specific ask for me is here. :-) Overall, I think moving
> queue stats to xstats is the best way to go.
> 

cc'ed because of "generic SW emulation" comment.

I was thinking if this mapping can be done transparent to the user by
driver mapping queue <-> stats_register before reading stats, but @Bruce
let me know this won't work because the stats tracking only happens
after the mapping.

@Stephen, do you have something specific in your mind for SW emulation
for mapping?

Reply via email to