On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com > wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:49:40PM +0000, Montorsi, Francesco wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Currently it seems that the only way to initialize EAL is using > rte_eal_init() function, correct? > > > > I have the problem that rte_eal_init() will call rte_panic() whenever > something fails to initialize or in other cases it will call exit(). > > In my application, I would rather like to attempt DPDK initialization. > If it fails I don't want to exit. > > Unfortunately I cannot even copy&paste the rte_eal_init() code into my > application (removing rte_panic and exit calls) since it uses a lot of DPDK > internal private functions. > > > > I think that my requirements (avoid abort/exit calls when init fails) is > a basic requirement... would you accept a patch that adds an alternative > rte_eal_init() function that just returns an error code upon failure, > instead of immediately exiting? > > > > Thanks for your hard work! > > > > Francesco Montorsi > > > I, for one, would welcome such a patch. I think the code is overly quick in > many places to panic or exit the app, when an error code would be more > appropriate. > Feel free to also look at other libraries in DPDK too, if you like :-) > > Regards, > /Bruce > +1
