On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:06:46 +0000
Sivaprasad Tummala <sivaprasad.tumm...@amd.com> wrote:
> +static struct rte_power_core_ops acpi_ops = {
> + .name = "acpi",
> + .init = power_acpi_cpufreq_init,
> + .exit = power_acpi_cpufreq_exit,
> + .check_env_support = power_acpi_cpufreq_check_supported,
> + .get_avail_freqs = power_acpi_cpufreq_freqs,
> + .get_freq = power_acpi_cpufreq_get_freq,
> + .set_freq = power_acpi_cpufreq_set_freq,
> + .freq_down = power_acpi_cpufreq_freq_down,
> + .freq_up = power_acpi_cpufreq_freq_up,
> + .freq_max = power_acpi_cpufreq_freq_max,
> + .freq_min = power_acpi_cpufreq_freq_min,
> + .turbo_status = power_acpi_turbo_status,
> + .enable_turbo = power_acpi_enable_turbo,
> + .disable_turbo = power_acpi_disable_turbo,
> + .get_caps = power_acpi_get_capabilities
> +};
> +
Can this be made const?
It is good for security and overall safety to have structures with
function pointers marked const.
