> ...to have a non-zero chance of getting accepted. > I see too much uncertainty in that statement with "non-zero chance". As the maintainer of this library and someone with the community's best interest in mind, can you outline the requirements for a rte_csrand implementation with a higher degree of confidence?
I want to know the criteria that must be satisfied for the acceptance probability to be close to 1. I'm sorry if I have not been abundantly clear on the requirements that I thought you would look for in such a patch. Maybe I misread your previous email. > > That's circular. "The reason we want this feature implementation to be > included is to satisfy those who want this feature implementation." > > Stop thinking like an ARM developer on a "software enablement" mission, and > start thinking like a DPDK library or application developer. We all think different in one way or the other, but what's more important is finding a common ground.
