Hi Bruce,
<snip>
> > /* attach the new physical device, then store port_id of the device
> > */ @@ -1143,14 +1141,11 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint8_t port_id,
> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> > * If link state interrupt is enabled, check that the
> > * device supports it.
> > */
> > - if (dev_conf->intr_conf.lsc == 1) {
> > - const struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv = &dev->driver-
> >pci_drv;
> > -
> > - if (!(pci_drv->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC)) {
> > + if ((dev_conf->intr_conf.lsc == 1) &&
> > + (!(dev->data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC))) {
> > PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("driver %s does not support
> lsc\n",
> > - pci_drv->name);
> > + dev->data->drv_name);
>
> Is this safe to do? From your previous patches for the vdevs, you appear to
> be setting the drv_name field to NULL for those vdevs, leading to undefined
> behaviour here. (printf may catch the NULL and print it as "(null)" rather
> than
> crashing, but it's still wrong!)
>
> /Bruce
It would be safer to set dev->data->drv_name to the PMD driver name.
Regards,
Bernard.
