19/06/2024 17:04, Stephen Hemminger: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 01:38:15 +0000 > "Jiang, YuX" <yux.ji...@intel.com> wrote: > > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:49 PM Stephen Hemminger > > > <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 10:41:18 -0700 > > > > Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit 6666628362c94a0b567a39a0177539c12c97d999. > > > > > > > > > > That commit broke use of dumpcap with vdev's and probably other uses > > > > > of secondary processes with vdev as well. > > > > > > > > > > Bugzilla ID: 1450 > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > > > > > Please review. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > David Marchand > > > > Hi Stephen, > > Can below patch series fix Bugzilla ID:1450? Can you have a try? > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=31507 > > > > Best regards, > > Yu Jiang > > Yes, that fixes what I was seeing where dumpcap or pdump (secondary process) > would not start when using vdev.
Then I will prefer the revert from the original author of the regression, with more details.
