> From: Morten Brørup [mailto:m...@smartsharesystems.com]
> 
> > From: Gregory Etelson [mailto:getel...@nvidia.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 18 June 2024 07.18
> >
> > DPDK IPv6 header definition combined the `version`, `traffic class`
> > and `flow label` header fields into a single 32 bits structure member
> > `vtc_flow`.
> >
> > The patch expands IPv6 header definition with dedicated structure
> > members for the `version`, `traffic class` and `flow label` fields.
> > The patch also preserves existing `vtc_flow` structure member for
> > backward compatibility.
> 
> Good addition.
> I had been wondering why we didn't have this already. :-)
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getel...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/net/rte_ip.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/net/rte_ip.h b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> > index 0d103d4127..26e78a6624 100644
> > --- a/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> > +++ b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> > @@ -524,7 +524,21 @@ rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_mbuf_verify(const struct rte_mbuf
> > *m,
> >   * IPv6 Header
> >   */
> >  struct rte_ipv6_hdr {
> > -   rte_be32_t vtc_flow;    /**< IP version, traffic class & flow label.
> > */
> > +   __extension__
> > +   union {
> > +           rte_be32_t vtc_flow;        /**< IP version, traffic class & 
> > flow
> > label. */
> 
> The mbuf structure [1] has __extension__ here,
> i.e. preceding the structure following the integer field,
> instead of preceding the union.
> 
> [1]: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h#n520
> 
> > +           struct {
> > +#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > +                   uint32_t flow_label:24; /**< flow label */
> 
> Flow Label is 20 bits, not 24.

I forgot to mention that the flow_label field should be rte_be32_t instead of 
uint32_t.

> 
> > +                   uint32_t tc:4;     /**< traffic class */
> 
> TC is 8 bits, not 4.

While you are at it, please also expand the "tc" field to another union with 
dedicated fields for "dscp:6" and "ecn:2", keeping the combined "tc" field too. 
The same goes for the IPv4 "type_of_service" field. This expansion could go 
into a separate patch, possibly in the same series.

> 
> > +                   uint32_t version:4; /**< version */
> > +#elif RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
> > +                   uint8_t version:4; /**< version */
> > +                   uint8_t tc:4;     /**< traffic class */
> 
> :8, not :4.
> 
> > +                   uint32_t flow_label:24; /**< flow label */
> 
> :20, not :24.
> 
> > +#endif
> > +           };
> > +   };
> >     rte_be16_t payload_len; /**< IP payload size, including ext. headers
> > */
> >     uint8_t  proto;         /**< Protocol, next header. */
> >     uint8_t  hop_limits;    /**< Hop limits. */
> > --
> > 2.43.0

Reply via email to