On 6/10/2024 11:07 PM, mmaatuq wrote:
> in case we didn't enter or finished the loop without getting ifname we
> ret shouldn't have an arbitrary value.
> 
> Coverity issue: 424690
> 
> Signed-off-by: mmaatuq <mahmoudmatook...@gmail.com>
>

Change looks good to me,
but can you please add Fixes tag [1] and perhaps stable tag based on the
fixes tag, checkpatch will generate a warning for it if required, after
Fixes tag added.

Also can you please use full name, as following capitalization:
Name Surname <email-all-lowerc...@domain.com>


[1]
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html#commit-messages-body


> ---
> v2:
>  Fixed typo in word "arbitrary"
> ---
>  drivers/net/mana/mana.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mana/mana.c b/drivers/net/mana/mana.c
> index 68c625258e..c37c4e3444 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mana/mana.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mana/mana.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ mana_dev_stats_reset(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused)
>  static int
>  mana_get_ifname(const struct mana_priv *priv, char (*ifname)[IF_NAMESIZE])
>  {
> -     int ret;
> +     int ret = -ENODEV;
>       DIR *dir;
>       struct dirent *dent;
> 
> --
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to