On 4/22/24 21:07, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Fix discrepancy in logic when using large fake mbuf. Fixes: fd96ef3787f1 ("test/bbdev: extend support for large TB") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com> --- app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c index dcce00aa0a17..efd046984d58 100644 --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c @@ -2131,7 +2131,8 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op, uint16_t data_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) - offset; total_data_size += orig_op->segments[i].length;- if (orig_op->segments[i].length > RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_E_MAX_MBUF)+ if ((orig_op->segments[i].length + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM) + > RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_E_MAX_MBUF) ignore_mbuf = true; if (!ignore_mbuf) TEST_ASSERT(orig_op->segments[i].length == data_len,
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> Thanks, Maxime
