04/06/2024 14:38, Rongwei Liu:
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> @@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ static const char *const flow_field_ids[] = {
> "ipv6_flow_label", "ipv6_traffic_class",
> "esp_spi", "esp_seq_num", "esp_proto",
> "random",
> + "vxlan_last_rsvd",
> NULL
> };
How vxlan_last_rsvd is linked to RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VXLAN_RSVD1 in testpmd?
Just because it is the same order?
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -2428,6 +2428,7 @@ enum rte_flow_field_id {
> RTE_FLOW_FIELD_ESP_SEQ_NUM, /**< ESP Sequence Number. */
> RTE_FLOW_FIELD_ESP_PROTO, /**< ESP next protocol value. */
> RTE_FLOW_FIELD_RANDOM, /**< Random value. */
> + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VXLAN_RSVD1, /**< VXLAN last reserved byte. */
> };
I think we should use the same naming as in testpmd.
What about RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VXLAN_LAST_RSVD?
