On 03/06/2024 17:01, Jack Bond-Preston wrote:
<snip>
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_copy(ctx, sess->cipher.ctx);
+
<snip>
This, and other patches in the set, are throwing a checkpatch error:
_coding style issues_
ERROR:SPACING: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
#99: FILE: drivers/crypto/openssl/rte_openssl_pmd.c:1593:
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
^
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 41 lines checked
Which I believe is a false positive - is it that checkpatch doesn't
recognise the type EVP_CIPHER_CTX and thinks this is multiplication?