On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:41 AM Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:12:39 +0000 > "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 5:13 PM > > > To: Van Haaren, Harry > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce; Jerin Jacob > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] event: fix warning from useless snprintf > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:45:52 +0000 > > > "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 4:45 AM > > > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > > > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; Stephen Hemminger; Van Haaren, Harry; Jerin > > > > > Jacob > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] event: fix warning from useless snprintf > > > > > > > > > > With Gcc-14, this warning is generated: > > > > > ../drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:263:3: warning: 'snprintf' will always > > > > > be truncated; > > > > > specified size is 12, but format string expands to at least 13 > > > > > [-Wformat-truncation] > > > > > 263 | snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "sw%d_iq_%d_rob", > > > > > dev_id, i); > > > > > | ^ > > > > > > > > > > Yet the whole printf to the buf is unnecessary. The type string > > > > > argument > > > > > has never been implemented, and should just be NULL. Removing the > > > > > unnecessary snprintf, then means IQ_ROB_NAMESIZE can be removed. > > > > > > > > I understand that today the "type" value isn't implemented, but across > > > > the DPDK codebase it > > > > seems like others are filling in "type" to be some debug-useful > > > > name/string. If it was added > > > > in future it'd be nice to have the ROB/IQ memory identified by name, > > > > like the rest of DPDK components. > > > > > > No, don't bother. This is a case of > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it > > > > I agree that YAGNI perhaps applied when designing the APIs, but the "type" > > parameter is there now... > > Should we add a guidance of "when reworking code, always pass NULL as the > > type parameter to rte_malloc functions" somewhere in the programmers guide, > > to align community with this "pass NULL for type" initiative? > > > > <snip> > > > > Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
Changed to event/sw: Applied to dpdk-next-eventdev/for-main. Thanks > >
