> -----Original Message----- > From: Xueming Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 3:32 PM > To: sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; David Christensen > <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; > Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; > Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca > Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Raslan > Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon > <tho...@monjalon.net>; Yanghang Liu <yangh...@redhat.com>; > benjamin.wal...@intel.com; qian.q...@intel.com; yuan.p...@intel.com; > zhaoyan.c...@intel.com > Subject: 23.11.1 patches review and test > > Hi all, > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 23.11.1. > > The planned date for the final release is 17th May. > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes > and > reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v23.11.1-rc2 > > These patches are located at branch 23.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > Thanks.
Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk23.11.1-rc2 all validation test done. no new issue is found. known issue: Start dpdk-pdump in VM with virtio-0.95 protocol failed: fix patches has been merged into main, but they not merged 23.11.1. so this issue still exists in 23.11.1-rc2 Patch link: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20231122102232.108299-2-mingjinx...@intel.com/ https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20231122102232.108299-3-mingjinx...@intel.com/ # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu23.10, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora39, RHEL8.9, RHEL9.2, FreeBSD14.0, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, openEuler22.03-SP2，OpenAnolis8.8 etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. * Cryptodev: *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. Regards, Xu, Hailin
