Hello Tyler,

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 10:20 PM Tyler Retzlaff
<roret...@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> rte_thash_gfni_bulk and rte_thash_gfni_bulk_stub both return void.
> Remove superfluous return statement from rte_thash_gfni_bulk.
>
> Fixes: 944a03a5cfc1 ("hash: fix MSVC link on GFNI stubs")
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  lib/hash/rte_thash_gfni.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_thash_gfni.h b/lib/hash/rte_thash_gfni.h
> index edae2e8..132f375 100644
> --- a/lib/hash/rte_thash_gfni.h
> +++ b/lib/hash/rte_thash_gfni.h
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
>  rte_thash_gfni_bulk(const uint64_t *mtrx, int len, uint8_t *tuple[],
>         uint32_t val[], uint32_t num)
>  {
> -       return rte_thash_gfni_bulk_stub(mtrx, len, tuple, val, num);
> +       rte_thash_gfni_bulk_stub(mtrx, len, tuple, val, num);
>  }

I am surprised the CI did not catch it.
I need to pass -pedantic when compiling with this header, but no code
does this in-tree.
How did you catch this issue?


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to