On 3/13/2024 7:24 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/8/2024 2:48 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> rte_eth_dev_info_get() is not supposed to fail for a valid port_id, but
>>> for the theoretical case when it would fail, raise an error rather than
>>> skip subsequent options.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6f51deb903b2 ("app/testpmd: check status of getting ethdev info")
>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
>>> index d715750bb8..8c21744009 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
>>> @@ -1128,9 +1128,9 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>>> 0,
>>> &dev_info);
>>> if (ret != 0)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - rec_nb_pkts = dev_info
>>> + rec_nb_pkts = 0;
>>> + else
>>> + rec_nb_pkts = dev_info
>>>
>>> .default_rxportconf.burst_size;
>>>
>>> if (rec_nb_pkts == 0)
>>
>> 'eth_dev_info_get_print_err()' already fail, but it may not be very
>> clear to the user,
>> OK to print a failure log, but setting 'rec_nb_pkts = 0;' as above also
>> will generate an error message that also may be confusing to the user.
>>
>> What about print an explicit error message for the
>> 'eth_dev_info_get_print_err()' failed case?
>
> rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Failed to retrieve device info, this is
> probably a driver bug. "
> "To workaround this issue, please provide a value between 1
> and %d\n", MAX_PKT_BURST);
>
> Does it work for you?
>
>
'eth_dev_info_get_print_err()' already logs error about getting device
info, but driver recommended 'burst' setting failed information is missing.
What about more direct,
"Failed to get driver recommended burst size, please provide a value
between 1 and MAX_PKT_BURST"
