<snipped>
- printf("Error: Source or destination numa exceeds the acture numa
nodes.\n");
+ printf("Error: %s numa exceeds the available numa nodes.\n",
+ (cfg->src_numa_node >= nr_sockets) ? "Source" :
"Destination");
Thank you for comments, please find my reasoning as `change is added to
address spelling issue of acture numa to available numa`
There are three cases to invoking:
1) src_numa_node >= nr_sockets
2) dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets
3) both src_numa_node and dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets
As per my testing, following scenarios are explored
1) if src-numa is incorrect, we get error message as `source is
incorrect numa`
2) if dst-numa is incorrect, we get error message as `destination is
incorrect numa`
3) if both src-numa and dst-numa are incorrect, we get error as `source
is incorrect numa`, fixing source and rerunning `destination is
incorrect numa` (which is expected)
It could cover cases 1&2 in your commit, but could not cover case 3.
I am happy to make changes to reflect the third scenario also. But
please note as shared, the real intention is to fix ` acture numa` to
something meaningful.
So I think we should keep original implement.
I humbly disagree, based on the explanation as shared above. I can share
v2 patch to address
1. acture numa
2. soruce or destination or src & destination
<snipped>
