On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:20 PM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote: > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > > Some ARM CPUs have specific march requirements and > are not compatible with the supported march list. > Add fallback march in case the mcpu and the march > advertised in the part_number_config are not supported > by the compiler. > > Example > mcpu = neoverse-n2 > march = armv9-a > fallback_march = armv8.5-a > > mcpu, march not supported > machine_args = ['-march=armv8.5-a'] > > mcpu, march, fallback_march not supported > least march supported = armv8-a > > machine_args = ['-march=armv8-a'] > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > --- > config/arm/meson.build | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build > index e77b696d8e..f6521653c8 100644 > --- a/config/arm/meson.build > +++ b/config/arm/meson.build > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ part_number_config_arm = { > '0xd49': { > 'march': 'armv9-a', > 'march_features': ['sve2'], > + 'fallback_march': 'armv8.5-a', > 'mcpu': 'neoverse-n2', > 'flags': [ > ['RTE_MACHINE', '"neoverse-n2"'], > @@ -716,6 +717,7 @@ if update_flags > > # probe supported archs and their features > candidate_march = '' > + fallback_march = '' > if part_number_config.has_key('march') and candidate_mcpu == '' > if part_number_config.get('force_march', false) > if cc.has_argument('-march=' + part_number_config['march']) > @@ -736,10 +738,18 @@ if update_flags > # highest supported march version found > break > endif > + if (part_number_config.has_key('fallback_march') and > + supported_march == part_number_config['fallback_march'] > and > + cc.has_argument('-march=' + supported_march)) > + fallback_march = supported_march > + endif
I'm trying to wrap my head around this. If I understand this correctly, fallback_march is going to be set only if fallback_march > part_number_config['march'] (fallback_march must be higher than the one in part_number_config, otherwise the loop will end with break before setting fallback_march). The added fallback_march configuration above is the opposite (fallback_march < part_number_config['march']) so I'm not sure what we're trying to accomplish here. Is the intention to specify a fallback_march that's lower than the one the original fallback mechanism would find? If so, we'll need to remove the break (and probably set check_compiler_support to false) so that the loop could continue. > endforeach > endif > > if candidate_march != part_number_config['march'] > + if fallback_march != '' > + candidate_march = fallback_march > + endif > warning('Configuration march version is @0@, not supported.' > .format(part_number_config['march'])) > if candidate_march != '' > -- > 2.25.1 >