On 10/21/2015 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-10-20 21:34, Stephen Hemminger: >> Patch backlog is not getting better, now at 486. >> >> How can we break this logjam? >> Do I need to make a new "ready for merge" tree? > > What would mean "ready for merge"? > A lot of patches are acked but do not compile or doc is missing.
Well, isn't that one quite reasonable definition of being "ready"? - patch must be acked - patch must apply and compile (when relevant) - is appropriately documented (commit message style and all) - Panu - > > I have the feeling it would become easier if there were mailing-list, > patchwork > and git tree dedicated to some areas. What about starting with drivers/net? >
