> On 2/2/2024 3:04 AM, Chaoyong He wrote: > > Make multiple devices can use single core to run services for flower > > firmware. > > Also add synchronize module and service module to support it. > > > > --- > > v2: > > * Merge the last commit of v1 into the second commit. > > > > Ask was to move the fix as first patch to make is backportable. > But by merging last (fix) commit into another one, you are completely loosing > the > capability to backport it to LTS releases. > > I just want to double check if this is intentionally and you don't want to > backport > a fix? >
Yes, it's intentionally and we don't want to backport it, thanks. > > > --- > > > > Long Wu (3): > > net/nfp: add synchronize module > > net/nfp: create new service code related files > > net/nfp: flower driver uses one service core > > > > drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c | 56 +-- > > drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c | 20 +- > > drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.h | 2 +- > > .../net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c | 7 + > > drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_service.c | 196 +++++++++ > > drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_service.h | 17 + > > drivers/net/nfp/meson.build | 3 + > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_cpp_bridge.c | 91 +---- > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_cpp_bridge.h | 1 - > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c | 31 +- > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net_common.h | 15 +- > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_service.c | 117 ++++++ > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_service.h | 20 + > > drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_sync.c | 382 ++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_sync.h | 31 ++ > > 15 files changed, 854 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) create mode > > 100644 drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_service.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_service.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/nfp/nfp_service.c create mode 100644 > > drivers/net/nfp/nfp_service.h create mode 100644 > > drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_sync.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_sync.h > >
