On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:20 PM Prashant Upadhyaya <praupadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 19:43, Bruce Richardson > <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:36:16PM +0530, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a usecase where I have to evaluate writing a DPDK PMD for a non > > > PCI/e device doing the ethernet packet i/o. > > > > > > Wanted to know if the above usecase is supported by DPDK infra and any > > > pointers on how one should go about writing a PMD for such a usecase > > > if supported. Would appreciate any inputs. > > > > > Hi, > > > > yes, such a usecase is supported, but the specifics of how to go about it > > will vary depending on the type of PMD it is. DPDK already supports a range > > of other types of PMD, for emulated, or SW backed PMDs, e.g. net/pcap > > driver, and drivers for various SoCs which don't use PCI. For the case > > where the PMD is backed by real hardware (or an emulated device that > > appears to a VM as a piece of hardware), you may want to consider writing a > > "bus" driver for DPDK to support probing of the device. For non-HW > > devices, the "vdev" bus may be what you want to use, where probing is not > > done and devices are created in response to cmdline arguments on init, or > > via C APIs later in the app. > > > > Regards, > > /Bruce > > Thanks Bruce, this is helpful. Is there any PMD in DPDK code that you > can refer me to for any SoC which does not use PCI (the usecase of > backing by real hardware), that would be great to follow.
See drivers/bus/* Based on your description, vfio-platorm will be the closest match(driver/bus/platform) > > Regards > -Prashant
