On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 05:41, Xu, HailinX <hailinx...@intel.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: luca.bocca...@gmail.com <luca.bocca...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 7:51 PM > > To: sta...@dpdk.org > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > > Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David > > Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob > > <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju- > > Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor > > <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang > > <pezh...@redhat.com>; qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh > > <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; > > Yanghang Liu <yangh...@redhat.com>; yuan.p...@intel.com; > > zhaoyan.c...@intel.com > > Subject: 20.11.10 patches review and test > > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.10. > > > > The planned date for the final release is December 12th. > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any > > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes > > and > > reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v20.11.10-rc1 > > > > These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > Thanks. > > > > Luca Boccassi > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.10-rc1 all > validation test is done. No new issue is found. > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest > GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu22.04, > Ubuntu20.04, Fedora38, RHEL9.2, RHEL8.7, FreeBSD13.2, Centos7.9 etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum > offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > Descriptor, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF > single core performance test, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - > QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * Cryptodev: > *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev > ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev > Latency, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > > Regards, > Xu, Hailin
Thank you!
