On 12/7/2023 1:42 AM, Jie Hai wrote: > Replace the use of gcc builtin __atomic_xxx intrinsics with > corresponding rte_atomic_xxx optional stdatomic API. > > Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haij...@huawei.com> >
<...> > static void > @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ hns3vf_get_push_lsc_cap(struct hns3_hw *hw) > uint16_t exp = HNS3_PF_PUSH_LSC_CAP_UNKNOWN; > struct hns3_vf *vf = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_VF(hw); > > - __atomic_store_n(&vf->pf_push_lsc_cap, HNS3_PF_PUSH_LSC_CAP_UNKNOWN, > - __ATOMIC_RELEASE); > + rte_atomic_load_explicit(&vf->pf_push_lsc_cap, > + HNS3_PF_PUSH_LSC_CAP_UNKNOWN, rte_memory_order_release); > I guess intension here is to use 'rte_atomic_store_explicit()', current code cause a build error [1]. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-December/525759.html
