> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:22 PM
> To: Vipin Varghese <vipin.vargh...@amd.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>;
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfgfile: increase value length
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:59:52PM +0530, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> > The default value for CFG_VALUE_LEN is set to 256 characters.
> > This limits the parsing for longer strings in configuration file.
> > Setting the default to 2048 characters increases the value array
> > size in `struct rte_cfgfile_entry`.
> >
> > Files using cfgfile library are
> > 1. drivers/net/mvpp2/
> > 2. app/test-dma-perf/
> > 3. app/test/
> > 4. examples/qos_sched/
> >
> > The structure `rte_cfgfile_entry` is not included in DPDK libraries.
> > Modifying from 256 to 2048 allows `app/test-dma-perf/main.c` helps to
> > parse longer string as shared in
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1333
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.vargh...@amd.com>
> > Suggested-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
> > ---
> > lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h b/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > index 232c65c77b..401353c44e 100644
> > --- a/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > +++ b/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifndef CFG_VALUE_LEN
> > -#define CFG_VALUE_LEN 256
> > +#define CFG_VALUE_LEN 2048
> > #endif
> >
> An increase seems ok to me, but is an 8x increase really necessary? If
> lines in the config files are over 1k in size, then it implies that some
> other mechanism would surely be better for configuration.
> Can we make do with an increase to 512 only?
>
> /Bruce
Happy to compromise with 1K.
Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
