Hi Thomas, Could you please apply the commits 1~6 ? There commits are independent and could use for current code.
Thanks On 2023/11/3 17:53, Chengwen Feng wrote: > When developing patchset [1], I found the kvargs test is hard to > understand when tried to add some testcase. > > So refactor kvargs by: > 1. introduce UT suite framework. > 2. extract big test_valid_kvargs() to five part. > > And add myself for voluntary maintenance of the kvargs library. > > Note: to ensure patch independenct, new API which in patchset [1] > are not included in this patchset. > > [1] > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20231103073811.13196-1-fengcheng...@huawei.com/ > > Chengwen Feng (7): > app/test: introduce UT suite framework for kvargs > app/test: extract basic token count testcase for kvargs > app/test: extract without keys testcase for kvargs > app/test: extract with keys testcase for kvargs > app/test: extract parse list value testcase for kvargs > app/test: extract parse empty elements testcase for kvargs > maintainers: update for kvargs library > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > app/test/test_kvargs.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-) >
