On 11/14/2023 11:48 AM, Mingjin Ye wrote:
This patch adds an API to support getting device information.

The driver can use the "rte_vfio_get_device_info" helper to get
device information from EAL.

Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx...@intel.com>
---
  lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c   | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  lib/eal/version.map        |  1 +
  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
index 3487c4f2a2..b3f55963e3 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
@@ -212,6 +212,32 @@ int
  rte_vfio_get_group_num(const char *sysfs_base,
                      const char *dev_addr, int *iommu_group_num);
+/**
+ * Get device information
+ *
+ * This function is only relevant to linux and will return
+ * an error on BSD.
+ *
+ * @param sysfs_base
+ *   sysfs path prefix.
+ *
+ * @param dev_addr
+ *   device location.
+ *
+ * @param vfio_dev_fd
+ *   VFIO fd.
+ *
+ * @param device_info
+ *   Device information.
+ *
+ * @return
+ *   0 on success.
+ *   <0 on failure.
+ */
+int
+rte_vfio_get_device_info(const char *sysfs_base, const char *dev_addr,
+                       int *vfio_dev_fd, struct vfio_device_info *device_info);
+
  /**
   * Open a new VFIO container fd
   *
diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
index ad3c1654b2..5810d9fcd7 100644
--- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
+++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
@@ -1222,6 +1222,25 @@ vfio_set_iommu_type(int vfio_container_fd)
        return NULL;
  }
+int
+rte_vfio_get_device_info(const char *sysfs_base, const char *dev_addr,
+                       int *vfio_dev_fd, struct vfio_device_info *device_info)
+{
+       if (!device_info || *vfio_dev_fd < 0)
+               return -1;

Do we not need to check other parameters? E.g. sysfs_base, dev_addr, vfio_dev_fd itself (could be NULL dereference).

+
+       if (*vfio_dev_fd == 0) {
+               if (rte_vfio_setup_device(sysfs_base, dev_addr,
+                               vfio_dev_fd, device_info))
+                       return -1;
+       } else {
+               if (ioctl(*vfio_dev_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO, &device_info))
+                       return -1;
+       }

Couldn't this just be an `else if`?

Would also be nice to have some DEBUG output here.

With all of the above addressed,

Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>

+
+       return 0;
+}
+
  int
  vfio_has_supported_extensions(int vfio_container_fd)
  {
diff --git a/lib/eal/version.map b/lib/eal/version.map
index e00a844805..8b4a9c237e 100644
--- a/lib/eal/version.map
+++ b/lib/eal/version.map
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ DPDK_24 {
        rte_vfio_noiommu_is_enabled; # WINDOWS_NO_EXPORT
        rte_vfio_release_device; # WINDOWS_NO_EXPORT
        rte_vfio_setup_device; # WINDOWS_NO_EXPORT
+       rte_vfio_get_device_info; # WINDOWS_NO_EXPORT
        rte_zmalloc;
        rte_zmalloc_socket;

--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to