Dear De Lara Guarch, Pablo.
I checked what you mentioned.
* Fedora Linux kernel version is as follows.
$ uname -r (print kernel name)
3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
$ uname -a
Linux sdnlab-k01 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 03:35:33 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 (mockbuild at
bkernel01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7)
(GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 03:35:33 UTC 2014
$ rpm -q kernel
kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
kernel-3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
kernel-3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
* Vt-d seems to be enabled. I heard that the result values of 3 or 5 mean the
virtualization activated.
$ sudo rdmsr 0x3A
5
And I have strange error during the yum update.
$ sudo yum update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
--> Running transaction check
---> Package aspell-en.x86_64 50:7.1-6.fc20 will be installed
---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.11.10-301.fc20 will be erased
---> Package kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.11.10-301.fc20 will be erased
---> Package kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.19.8-100.fc20 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 for
package: kernel-modules-extra-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: kernel-modules-extra-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 (updates)
Requires: kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64
Installed: kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 (@anaconda)
kernel-uname-r = 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
Installed: kernel-3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64 (installed)
kernel-uname-r = 3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
Installed: kernel-3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64 (@updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.17.7-200.fc20.x86_64
Available: kernel-debug-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 (fedora)
kernel-uname-r = 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64+debug
Available: kernel-debug-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 (updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64+debug
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
* There are virtual bridge and virtual nic in the Fedora server.
$ ifconfig or $ ifconfig -a
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet ?.?.?.? netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast ?.?.?.?
ether 52:54:00:f2:70:98 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0-nic: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 52:54:00:f2:70:98 txqueuelen 500 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Thank you very much.
Sincerely Yours,
Ick-Sung Choi.
-----Original Message-----
From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo"<pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
To: "???"<pnk003 at naver.com>; "dev at dpdk.org"<dev at dpdk.org>;
Cc:
Sent: 2015-10-14 (?) 22:19:02
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] I have a problem in setting up DPDK 2.1.0 in Fedora OS
release 20 (Heisenbug). I cannot r
Hi Ick-Sung,
> * Fedora OS version : Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
>
> * gcc version : gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7).
>
> * Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 10 cores, 64G bytes system memory.
> * 2 2-port NIC cards, Intel? 82599ES 10 Gigabit Ethernet 2 port Controller.
> SFI/SFP+. optical link. Hence there are 4 10 GbE ports.
>
> * I attached DPDK setup script in my environment.
What is your kernel version? And also, can you check if you have VT-d enabled?
Thanks,
Pablo
>
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Sincerely Yours,
>
> Ick-Sung Choi.
