On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:33:50 +0200 David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Switching to rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() still leaves the user with the > possibility to shoot himself in the foot (I was thinking of setting > some --mbuf-pool-ops-name EAL option). > > This application has explicit requirements in terms of concurrent > access (and I don't think the mempool library exposes per driver > capabilities in that regard). > The application was enforcing the use of mempool/ring so far. > > I think it is safer to go with an explicit > rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_by_ops(... "ring_mp_mc"). > WDYT? The dumpcap command does not have EAL command line arguments that can be changed by user.
