> -----Original Message-----
> From: beilei.x...@intel.com <beilei.x...@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 7:07 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix memory leak
>
> From: Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>
>
> Fix resource leak reported in coverity scan.
>
> Coverity issue: 403265
> Fixes: 2d823ecd671c ("net/cpfl: support device initialization")
> Fixes: 989465ac51ea ("net/cpfl: support probe again")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> index 890a027a1d..0093deab5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> @@ -1626,7 +1626,8 @@ cpfl_parse_devargs(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
> struct cpfl_adapter_ext *adap
>
> if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, CPFL_VPORT) > 1) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "devarg vport is duplicated.");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail;
> }
>
> ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, CPFL_REPRESENTOR, &parse_repr,
> cpfl_args); @@ -1635,7 +1636,7 @@ cpfl_parse_devargs(struct
> rte_pci_device *pci_dev, struct cpfl_adapter_ext *adap
> goto fail;
>
> if (!first)
> - return 0;
> + goto fail;
goto fail in a success case cause confusion, maybe we can rename "fail" as
"finish", or adding a another label right before "fail"?
>
> ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, CPFL_VPORT, &parse_vport,
> cpfl_args);
> --
> 2.34.1
