Hello Ciara, On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:37 AM Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > +-----+-----+-----+-----+----------+---------------+---------------+------------+--- > > -----+------+--------+--------+ > > > | Yes | No | No | 4 | 401xxx | IDZ/ N/A | qat_401xxx | > > > 4xxx | > > 4942 | 2 | 4943 | 16 | > > > > > > +-----+-----+-----+-----+----------+---------------+---------------+-- > > > ----------+--------+------+--------+--------+ > > > + | Yes | Yes | Yes | 4 | 402xxx | linux/6.4+ | qat_402xxx | > > > 4xxx | > > 4944 | 2 | 4945 | 16 | > > > + > > > +-----+-----+-----+-----+----------+---------------+---------------+------------+-- > > ------+------+--------+--------+ > > > + | Yes | No | No | 4 | 402xxx | IDZ/ N/A | qat_402xxx | > > > 4xxx | > > 4944 | 2 | 4945 | 16 | > > > + > > > + +-----+-----+-----+-----+----------+---------------+---------------+ > > > + ------------+--------+------+--------+--------+ > > > > Is there such a kernel module named qat_402xxx upstream? > > I can only find qat_4xxx. > > > Good catch, you're right, there is no kernel module 402xxx. > These devices fall under the original 4xxx driver. > Will update here, and send a fix for the 401xxx entry later.
I noticed this patch for 402xxx pulled in the main branch. Don't forget to send the fix on 401xxx entry please. -- David Marchand
