Hello Stephen,
hw struct is just used in control plane, I think it has little impact on
performance, howerver I am going to take your advice and fix it in next
version of patches.
Thanks.
On 2023/9/18 10:28, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 12:56:30 +0800
<wa...@3snic.com> wrote:
static int
sssnic_ethdev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev)
{
- RTE_SET_USED(ethdev);
+ int ret;
+ struct sssnic_hw *hw;
+ struct sssnic_netdev *netdev;
+ struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev;
+
PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
+ return 0;
+
+ netdev = SSSNIC_ETHDEV_PRIVATE(ethdev);
+ pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(ethdev);
+ hw = rte_zmalloc("sssnic_hw", sizeof(struct sssnic_hw), 0);
For performance you might want to use rte_zmalloc_socket() to make sure
the hw structure is on the same NUMA node as PCI device.
--
Regards,
Renyong Wan