On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:10:17AM +0100, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 10:38 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] event/sw: remove obsolete comment
> >
> > Code that the comment refers to was previously removed, but the
> > comment remained.
> >
> > Fixes: dca926ca9faa ("event/sw: use dynamically-sized IQs")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Do we want to backport this? It's a code-level change, that doesn't really
> "fix" any issue.
> I'm fine with it being backported to stables, or skipped.
>
> Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
>
I'd take the view that since backporting is going to be entirely harmless,
and it does fix the code for anyone trying to read it, we might as well do so.
