10/07/2023 20:42, Tyler Retzlaff:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:14:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > When looking at threads in a system, it can be confusing
> > to find some unknown threads without a clue it is started by DPDK.
> > 
> > Let's start all thread names with "dpdk-"
> > plus the driver name if it comes from a driver.
> > 
> > One more constraint: the thread names are generally limited
> > to 16 characters, including the NUL character.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> > ---
> > Please review carefully, I may have missed things.
> 
> i think the only caution here is that some of the new names may be
> truncated where the valuable information is lost in the truncation?
> 
> #define RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN 16
> 
> a limit inherited from linux and adopted as the dpdk standard/maximum.
> by prefixing dpdk- we end up with a bit less name length budget to spend
> potentially causing the most important part of the thread name to be lost.
> 
> a couple of notes though.
>   * some of the existing names may already suffer from truncation. i
>     didn't check but can see some that look close.
>   * some of your new names have reduced the length so they are in fact
>     better.
> 
> Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>

Updated for the recently added txgbe thread,
and applied.


Reply via email to