10/07/2023 20:42, Tyler Retzlaff: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:14:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > When looking at threads in a system, it can be confusing > > to find some unknown threads without a clue it is started by DPDK. > > > > Let's start all thread names with "dpdk-" > > plus the driver name if it comes from a driver. > > > > One more constraint: the thread names are generally limited > > to 16 characters, including the NUL character. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > --- > > Please review carefully, I may have missed things. > > i think the only caution here is that some of the new names may be > truncated where the valuable information is lost in the truncation? > > #define RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN 16 > > a limit inherited from linux and adopted as the dpdk standard/maximum. > by prefixing dpdk- we end up with a bit less name length budget to spend > potentially causing the most important part of the thread name to be lost. > > a couple of notes though. > * some of the existing names may already suffer from truncation. i > didn't check but can see some that look close. > * some of your new names have reduced the length so they are in fact > better. > > Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
Updated for the recently added txgbe thread, and applied.