> -----Original Message----- > From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com> > Sent: 8/31/2023 9:24 > To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; fengcheng...@huawei.com; Ivan Malov > <ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add new symmetric hash function > > > 在 2023/8/30 21:09, Xueming(Steven) Li 写道: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com> > >> Sent: 8/30/2023 20:42 > >> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam > >> <or...@nvidia.com> > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; fengcheng...@huawei.com; Ivan Malov > >> <ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add new symmetric hash function > >> > >> > >> 在 2023/8/30 16:38, Xueming(Steven) Li 写道: > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com> > >>>> Sent: 8/30/2023 15:51 > >>>> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam > >>>> <or...@nvidia.com> > >>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; fengcheng...@huawei.com; Ivan Malov > >>>> <ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am> > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add new symmetric hash function > >>>> > >>>> Hi Xueming, > >>>> > >>>> 在 2023/8/27 16:17, Xueming Li 写道: > >>>>> The new symmetric hash function swap src/dst L3 address and > >>>>> L4 ports automatically by sorting. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 7 +++++++ > >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index > >>>>> 2ebb76dbc0..4f4421ca50 100644 > >>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h > >>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h > >>>>> @@ -3196,6 +3196,13 @@ enum rte_eth_hash_function { > >>>>> * src or dst address will xor with zero pair. > >>>>> */ > >>>>> RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_SYMMETRIC_TOEPLITZ, > >>>>> + /** > >>>>> + * Symmetric Toeplitz: L3 and L4 fields are sorted prior to > >>>>> + * the hash function. > >>>>> + * If src_ip > dst_ip, swap src_ip and dst_ip. > >>>>> + * If src_port > dst_port, swap src_port and dst_port. > >>>>> + */ > >>>> If hash result are computed by the order: > >> "src_ip+dst_ip+src_port+dst_port" > >>>> How to obtain the value of every L3 and L4 field obove? > >>>> I still cannot understand how to swap and set these values for these > fields? > >>> Hash result is computed by order ""src_ip+dst_ip+src_port+dst_port" > >>> Here is a detailed explanation of standard hash and symmetric hash by > key: > >>> https://www.ndsl.kaist.edu/~kyoungsoo/papers/TR-symRSS.pdf > >>> > >>> If src_ip > dst_ip, swap them, then the input becomes: > >>> "dst_ip+src_ip+src_port+dst_port" // please note src and dst IP > >>> are > >> swapped. > >>> Same for L4 ports. > >> get it. > >> What are the advantages of the symmetric toeplitz sort? > >> Or why swap here? > > It's a different symmetric hash calculation, hardware can support either/all > of them. > > > > From calculation perspective, the hash result distribution is better, > > the result is more suitable to be used as hash table key. > I get it now. > but I have a question. > why not is that if src_ip < dst_ip, then swap src_ip and dst_ip? > I guess this is going to have the same effect as you said, right? > The symmetric toeplitz sort is not a standard algorithm, is just to enhance > the > hash result distribution. > If what I understand is right, > it is better that the new RSS algorithm should works on the one of them > ("src_ip > dst_ip" or "src_ip < dst_ip").
Any special reason to introduce the descending sort? I personally prefer to keep the enum clean unless some new hw or new algorithm introduced. > > > >>>>> + RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_SYMMETRIC_TOEPLITZ_SORT, > >>>>> RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_MAX, > >>>>> }; > >>>>>