On 10/01/2015 02:27 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:20:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> People will just use out of tree drivers (dpdk has several already). It's a >> pain, but nowhere near what you are proposing. > What's the issue with that?
Out of tree drivers have to be compiled on the target system (cannot ship a binary package), and occasionally break. dkms helps with that, as do distributions that promise binary compatibility, but it is still a pain, compared to just shipping a userspace package. > We already agreed this kernel > is going to be tainted, and unsupportable. Yes. So your only motivation in rejecting the patch is to get the author to write the ring translation patch and port it to all relevant drivers instead?
