> -----Original Message----- > From: Luca Boccassi <luca.bocca...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 2:55 PM > To: Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; John McNamara > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; > NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <tho...@monjalon.net>; Wael > Abualrub <wa...@nvidia.com> > Subject: Re: 20.11.9 patches review and test > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 12:52, Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: luca.bocca...@gmail.com <luca.bocca...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 2:08 AM > > > To: sta...@dpdk.org > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe > <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > > > Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David > > > Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > > > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin > Jacob > > > <jer...@marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju- > > > Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor > <ktray...@redhat.com>; > > > Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan > Darawsheh > > > <rasl...@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) > > > <tho...@monjalon.net>; Yanghang Liu <yangh...@redhat.com>; > > > yuan.p...@intel.com; zhaoyan.c...@intel.com > > > Subject: 20.11.9 patches review and test > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.9. > > > > > > The planned date for the final release is the 14th of August 2023. > > > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > > > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v20.11.9-rc1 > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > --- > > > > Hello, > > > > Apologies for the last-minute reply. > > > > We ran the following functional tests with Nvidia hardware on v20.11.9-rc1: > > - Basic functionality: > > Send and receive multiple types of traffic. > > - testpmd xstats counter test. > > - testpmd timestamp test. > > - Changing/checking link status through testpmd. > > - rte_flow tests. > > - Some RSS tests. > > - VLAN filtering, stripping and insertion tests. > > - Checksum and TSO tests. > > - ptype tests. > > - link_status_interrupt example application tests. > > - l3fwd-power example application tests. > > - Multi-process example applications tests. > > - Hardware LRO tests. > > > > Functional tests ran on these cards: > > - NIC: ConnectX-6 Dx / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX- > 23.04-1.1.3.0 / Firmware: 22.37.1014 > > - NIC: ConnectX-7 / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-23.04- > 1.1.3.0 / Firmware: 28.37.1014 > > - DPU: BlueField-2 / DOCA SW version: 2.0.2 / Firmware: 24.37.1300 > > > > Build tests (all passed): > > - Ubuntu 20.04.6 with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-23.04-1.1.3.0. > > - Ubuntu 20.04.6 with rdma-core master (aba30bd). > > - Ubuntu 20.04.6 with rdma-core v28.0. > > - Ubuntu 18.04.6 with rdma-core master (aba30bd) (i386). > > - Fedora 38 with rdma-core v44.0. > > - Fedora 39 (Rawhide) with rdma-core v46.0. > > - OpenSUSE Leap 15.5 with rdma-core v42.0. > > - Windows Server 2019 with Clang 11.0.0. > > > > We see warnings while restarting ports in testpmd application if MPRQ is > enabled, and we think it's caused by this backported change: > > net/mlx5: fix MPRQ stride size to accommodate the headroom > (https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=81002988e01) > > This is the only issue we found that might've been caused by changes in this > release. Hope I can update by tomorrow. > > > > We're investigating some internal test failures that were caused by > environment changes, but we have a high pass rate in our regression testing > overall. > > > > Thanks, > > Ali > > Thank you, I'll wait for the conclusion on that, if I need to revert > that change let me know. >
Hi Luca, I created a Bugzilla ticket to track the issues with Multi-Packet Rx queue (mprq). We hope to resolve it in 20.11.10: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1274 - [20.11 LTS] Multi-Packet Rx queue parameters are incorrectly adjusted and not applied properly We're ok to release. Thanks, Ali
