Hi all,
The API "rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_with_params()" is an extension to
rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create() with additional adapter configuration params
structure.
There is no equivalent API existing today for
"rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_ext()" API. We may need to have one more
adapter create API for this.
That makes so many Adapter create APIs and will be confusing for the user.
I am proposing the following changes to the Rx adapter create APIs which
will consolidate the create APIs to 2 in number with all possible combinations.
Current RX Adapter create APIs
Proposed changes
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_ext(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_conf_cb conf_cb,
void *conf_arg)
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_ext(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_conf_cb conf_cb,
void *conf_arg,
struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_params *rxa_params)
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
struct rte_event_port_conf *port_config)
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
struct rte_event_port_conf *port_config,
struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_params *rxa_params)
int rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_with_params(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
struct rte_event_port_conf *port_config,
struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_params *rxa_params)
Will be deprecated.
The applications that are currently using rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create_ext()
or rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create() APIs for creating Rx adapter can pass NULL
argument for the
Newly added argument which will behave same as before.
Let me know your comments for this change.
Patchwork link:
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230801094004.51939-1-s.v.naga.haris...@intel.com/
-Harish
