On 7/3/2023 12:36 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 22:52:20 +0530 > aman.ku...@vvdntech.in wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> QDMA is a very generic name and many vendors have IP for it. >>>>> >>>>> My suggestions is the qualify the specific driver with vendor name i.e. >>>>> amd_qdma or xilinx_qdma or something similar. >>>>> >>>>> NXP also did the same dpaa2_qdma >>>>> >>>>> >>>> @Thomas, @Hemant, >>>> Thank you for highlights and suggestions regarding conflicting names. >>>> We've discussed this internally and came up with below plan. >>>> >>>> For v22.11 DPDK, we would like to submit patches with below renames: >>>> drivers/net/qdma -> drivers/net/t1 >>>> drivers/net/qdma/qdma_*.c/h -> drivers/net/t1/t1_*.c/h >>>> driver/net/qdma/qdma_access -> driver/net/t1/base >>> >>> Curious why "t1"? >>> What is the meaning? >> >> The hardware is commerically named as the "T1 card". T1 represents first >> card of the telco accelerator series. >> https://www.xilinx.com/publications/product-briefs/xilinx-t1-product-brief.pdf >> > > The discussion around this driver stalled. Either hardware abandoned, > renamed, or there was no interest. > If you want to get this in a future DPDK release, please resubmit a new > version addressing review comments. >
Hi Stephen, I can confirm that this work is stalled, and it is not clear yet if there will be a new version or not, so OK to clean this from patchwork. Thanks, ferruh
