> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 9:19 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu...@intel.com>; Wang, YuanX <yuanx.w...@intel.com>;
> Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> m...@smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>;
> amitpraka...@marvell.com; ano...@marvell.com;
> huangdeng...@huawei.com; Laatz, Kevin <kevin.la...@intel.com>;
> fengcheng...@huawei.com; jer...@marvell.com; dev@dpdk.org; Ding,
> Xuan <xuan.d...@intel.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux...@intel.com>; He,
> Xingguang <xingguang...@intel.com>; Ling, WeiX <weix.l...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf application
>
> 29/06/2023 14:50, Jiang, Cheng1:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> > > 28/06/2023 03:20, Cheng Jiang:
> > > > There are many high-performance DMA devices supported in DPDK
> now,
> > > and
> > > > these DMA devices can also be integrated into other modules of
> > > > DPDK as accelerators, such as Vhost. Before integrating DMA into
> > > > applications, developers need to know the performance of these DMA
> > > > devices in various scenarios and the performance of CPUs in the
> > > > same scenario, such as different buffer lengths. Only in this way
> > > > can we know the target performance of the application accelerated
> > > > by using them. This patch introduces a high-performance testing
> > > > tool, which supports comparing the performance of CPU and DMA in
> > > > different scenarios automatically with a pre-set config file.
> > > > Memory Copy performance test are
> > > supported for now.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Hu <jiayu...@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.w...@intel.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo....@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Who is going to be the maintainer for this new app?
> > > An entry in the file MAINTAINERS would be perfect.
> > >
> >
> > I can be the maintainer for this new app. Okay, I will add an entry to the
> MAINTAINERS file.
> > Would you prefer I send a new version patch to add this entry, or send a
> separate patch?
>
> It should be part of this patch.
>
>
Sure, I'll submit a new patch. Thanks.
>
>
